Do masks “flatten the curve”?

Mask Mandates

We all know and suffer from a case of mask mandates here in Montana… Do they work? Are they flattening the curve? Matt Margolis goes over the data comparing case counts and mask mandates. IF mask wearing was effective, you would see an impact when mask mandates are made. However, that’s not the case.

The Data

People have said that we don’t have any data. However, we have nine months of data here in the US and seven months since the initial lockdowns. Included are the graphs tracking case counts, lockdowns, mask mandates, fines imposed, etc.

Rational Ground

It’s Time to End the Mask Mandates

There’s no sound data that suggests the need to wear masks. Instead it points to the fact that masks do very little to prevent the inhalation of small particles. And as shown above, the actual implementation of mask mandates haven’t had an impact in “flattening the curve”.

A cloth mask or face covering does very little to prevent the emission or inhalation of small particles. As discussed in an earlier CIDRAP commentary and more recently by Morawska and Milton (2020) in an open letter to WHO signed by 239 scientists, inhalation of small infectious particles is not only biologically plausible, but the epidemiology supports it as an important mode of transmission for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.

CIDRAP – Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy

Also, some places without mask mandates have done better than those with the mandates. Here’s a great article by William Sullivan at American Thinker about the reasons to end the mask mandates. Even though it was back in August, most of the information still applies.

What are Others Doing to End Mask Mandates?

In Florida

In Florida, conservative lawyer and state House Rep. Anthony Sabatini cheered the defeat of Wolf’s draconian COVID-19 orders. “Some in the Judiciary are finally waking up to the fact that the government is not always right — and that the constitution is not suspended during an emergency,” he told me. Sabatini has filed 15 ongoing challenges to the Sunshine State’s lockdown measures. “We’re looking forward to winning.”

RealClear Politics

In Colorado

In Colorado, I joined a similar lawsuit with state House Rep. Pat Neville to challenge Gov. Jared Polis’ whopping 166 COVID-19 executive orders, as well as multiple public health orders issued by state and county health departments. As in Pennsylvania, our state Supreme Court declined to hear the case. So we filed in Denver District Court two weeks ago. Polis and other government officials are on notice: No more kings.

RealClear Politics

In Orange County California The Healthy American was suing the board of supervisors for Fraud. Because Fraud is a felony, there’s prison sentences behind it. The county overturned the mask mandate the next day.

The Healthy American

Masks Have Been Tried Before

Did you know that masks were tried during the Spanish Flu of 1918? The following is an excerpt of an article showing the impact of mandatory mask wearing and the subsequent mask requirement removed. This was during the Spanish Flu of 1918

W Vaughan. Influenza: An epidemiologic study. Baltimore MD: Am J Hygiene. Monographic series. 1921. 1. 241.

From a historian regarding the ineffectiveness of wearing masks during the Spanish Flu:

The quarantine, isolation and mask-wearing failed to diminish the spread of the influenza. Instead the practices likely increased fatality and had disastrous economic consequences. The medical policy of 1918 was contrary to the medical science of 1918, and the destructive practices of quarantine, isolation and mask-wearing were largely abandoned.

A Ciani. A pandemic of socialism. American Thinker. Aug 24, 2020.

Spanish Flu Deaths Really from Bacterial Pneumonia

Dr Fauci and others have researched the Spanish Flu and found that almost all, if not all deaths from the Spanish Flu were from Bacterial Pneumonia.

Masks Are Causing Bacterial Pneumonia

If you’d rather reduce your chances of catching bacterial pneumonia, don’t wear a face mask! Doctors are finding that bacterial pneumonia is on the rise due to the wearing of face masks.

In a study by doctors, they’ve found that masks can cause lung issues due to mask particulates and the bacterial petri dishes on your face (masks).

Masks Are Ineffective At Preventing Respiratory Pathogen Transmission

In the following article, study after study found that masks weren’t effective at preventing disease. Some noticed a very slight reduction to getting flu like symptoms and others didn’t notice any effect. Read the article: Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science.

Over 2,000 Belgian Medical Professionals Oppose Continued Measures

We, doctors and health professionals, wish to express our serious concern about the evolution of the situation in the recent months surrounding the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We call on politicians to be independently and critically informed in the decision-making process and in the compulsory implementation of corona-measures. We ask for an open debate, where all experts are represented without any form of censorship. After the initial panic surrounding covid-19, the objective facts now show a completely different picture – there is no medical justification for any emergency policy anymore.

The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good.

We call for an end to all measures and ask for an immediate restoration of our normal democratic governance and legal structures and of all our civil liberties.

Docs 4 Open Debate

Bacterial Pneumonias On The Rise

Mask Particulates Partially To Blame

Some doctors have found as they’ve researched the safety of masks that mask particulates may be breathed into the lungs. If too much of this occurs, it can cause problems in your lungs.

Bacteria Grown In The Mask Partially To Blame

Masks are a fertile environment to grow bacteria. Recently, in Michigan, there was an unusually large outbreak of strep throat among public school students. The wearing of masks have also produced life-threatening legionella pneumonia and strep. Oral bacteria, when it gains access to blood and deep tissue, can cause:

  • pneumonia
  • abscesses in the lungs
  • subacute bacterial endocarditis
  • sepsis
  • meningitis
  • type 2 diabetes
  • hypertension
  • cardiovascular disease

Main Cause of 1918 Spanish Flu

Bacterial Pneumonia

The Spanish Flu is credited with causing the death of some 20 to 100 MILLION people! However, after extensive research, researchers found that close to all if not all deaths had bacterial pneumonia.

Bacteria were the real killers in 1918 flu pandemic

Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness

From their research they found it important to stockpile antibiotics and vaccines against bacterial pneumonia. Do we have sufficient quantities of antibiotics to address bacterial pneumonia today?

What Caused the Pneumonia?

According to Winter Watch, the Pneumonia was brought on by new experimental vaccines injected into willing test subjects… Soldiers. The outbreaks of the disease took place in 14 of the largest training camps.

The PCR Test Used to Test for Covid-19: Is it Reliable?

What if I were to tell you that the PCR test being used to test for Covid-19 does not specifically test for Covid-19?  Yes, that’s right, this standard test does not give a positive or negative reading for Covid-19.  Rather, it detects DNA that could be related to a number of different coronoaviruses.  So, why are we relying on this test to determine safety protocols and lockdown measures?  Beats me. 

Reading List

Logic: The Right Use of Reason in the Inquiry After Truth – Isaac Watts

How to Argue and Win Every Time – Gerry Spence

Introductory Logic – Douglas J Wilson

N.E.A. Trojan Horse in American Education – Samuel L Blumenfeld

Home Education and Constitutional Liberties – John W. Whitehead/Wendell R Bird

The Spirit of America – Words of Advice from the Founders in Stories, Letters, Poems & Speeches – William J Bennett

The New England Primer

The Original Blue Back Speller

The Light and the Glory – Did God have a plan for America? – Peter Marshall/David Manuel

America’s Providential History – Mark A Beliles/Stephen K McDowell

Rush Revere Series for Kids – Rush Limbaugh

The Tuttle Twins Book Series & PDF Workbooks Connor Boyack

Uncle Eric Book Series – Richard J Maybury

1828 American Dictionary of the English Language – Noah Webster

The Christian History of the Constitution of the United States of America – Christian Self-Government – Verna M Hall

The Christian History of The American Revolution – Consider And Ponder – Verna M Hall

America’s God and Country – Encyclopedia of Quotations – William J Federer

Original Intent – The Courts, the Constitution & Religion – David Barton

The Story of the Constitution – The Christian Liberty Edition

The Constitution Explained – Harry Atwood

The Evolution and Destruction of the Original Electoral College – Gary & Carolyn Alder

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary – Vol I & Vol II – John Bouvier

The Christian Life and Character of the Civil Institutions of the United States – Benjamin F Morris

Confrontational Politics – Senator H.L. Richardson, Ret.

Life of Patrick Henry – William Wirt

A Caveat Against Injustice – Roger Sherman

Baofeng Programming Files

Hi Team,
I have attached the files for the radio programming.
“Baofeng_UV-82HPProgramming.img” is the datafile used by the CHIRP programming software.

“BaofengUV82HPProgramming.csv” is a comma delimited text file that can be imported into the CHIRP software

“BaofengUV82HPProgramming.pdf” is a pdf file that is easy to read listing all the channels, frequencies, codes, channel names, etc. This is what is in the programming .img file.

“Radio Training.docx” is a Word file of the notes I used for the training speech.

When using CHIRP for your radios, I suggest:
-Download from the radio the data from your existing radio.
-Erase all of the old radio data from the file on your screen.
-Import the channel data from “BaofengUV82HPProgramming.csv” into the empty screen.
-Upload the info to your radios.

The reason for the above is that you may have different firmware then the club radios. CHIRP is not smart enough to copy data between radios with different firmware. By downloading the data from an existing radio, you get the correct firmware version. Then you fill that file on your screen with the new channel data from importing the .csv file.

Good Luck,


Can we trust COVID-19 testing?

Most of our public policies are being driven by the verdict of “deadly pandemic” based on a massive testing effort. But if we can’t trust the test, how can we trust the verdict?

The main test being used as a diagnostic is the PCR test. It was invented in 1985 by Kary Mullis. Yet it was not designed for detecting viruses, let alone for diagnosing humans as being sick and infectious. Kary Mullis is quoted in the New York Times as being very critical of his fellow scientists and questioned many of their assumptions. It is sad that he died before his work was applied in such a sloppy fashion.

How do PCR tests work?

The PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test does not detect viruses. It detects specific target DNA or RNA sequences. It amplifies the target sequence millions of times to make that sequence detectable. This amplification is performed by doubling the target material over and over. The greater the number of cycles, the more DNA is manufactured.

For COVID-19 PCR tests, there are DNA sequences that are multiplied over and over with until they are detectable. These sequences came originally from the scientists in Wuhan, China.

What are the problems with this test?

A Test Without a Standard

If you imagine administering a test in school, someone has to know the standard. We need to know what are the correct answers, and then we need to know how many correct answers are a passing grade. Do we have a standard for these PCR tests? We do not.

Please do the research yourself, but the biggest problem with the PCR tests is that the multiplication factor used to multiply the target sequence is not standardized anywhere. If someone is tested for COVID-19, we don’t know how frequently the target sequence has been multiplied. A positive result can be guaranteed if the multiplication factor is increased sufficiently. This article is a good source to explain many aspects of the issue, often from the mouth of Kary Mullis himself, the inventor of PCR.

What are We Looking For?

Perhaps an even more disturbing question to ask about the tests: Do we even know what we are looking for?

Can we truly say that the DNA sequences that are being tested for really correlate to a deadly virus?

The PCR amplifies genetic material. But what genetic material is it amplifying? It is not even the full genetic code of a virus. They only look for a snippet of the viral RNA. These are the same snippets tested for at the original “outbreak” in Wuhan, China. How did these scientists come by these snippets? Why did countries around the world trust these snippets?

This article won’t try to answer these difficult questions directly, but we suggest you view the excellent documentary Plandemic: inDoctorNation to see the hard evidence behind some serious conflict of interest.

What we will point out is the evidence that the deadly virus supposedly causing this pandemic has not been isolated and purified. Being able to isolate the problem virus would help us verify that the tests actually work. Instead what we have is a pandemic of tests, not a pandemic of viruses.

A Pandemic of False Positives

The PCR test has shown positive results on goats, fruit, and even motor oil by the president of Tanzania back in May 2020.

Since the PCR test cannot tell whether or not this genetic sequence is inside an infectious virus or not, and has not been proven to correlate with an isolated strain of actual viral particles, what we have is a growing epidemic of testing.

The more tests that are executed, the greater the number of “cases”.

We hope you will ask the hard questions, and do the research yourself. Once you do, we’re sure you will know that we can’t trust these tests. More importantly, we can’t trust those who are promoting them.